Paste listing copy or marketing text. Get a structured review that flags potentially non-compliant language, surfaces missing disclosures, and suggests neutral alternatives — so the listing you touch doesn't become the liability you carry.
You didn't write the listing. You probably didn't approve it. But the moment it enters your transaction file, you're connected to it.
A listing that says "perfect for young professionals" has fair housing implications. A description that mentions "walking distance to houses of worship" may not be neutral. A condo listing that fails to mention an active special assessment or a pending milestone inspection has a disclosure gap that somebody will eventually notice.
You're not the listing agent. But you review these materials. You coordinate around them. And if a complaint is filed or a buyer raises a concern post-closing, the question will be: did anyone on the transaction side flag this?
The issue isn't that you don't know fair housing law exists. The issue is that reviewing listing language for compliance isn't a structured part of most TC workflows — because until now, there hasn't been a practical way to do it quickly.
This is not about policing listing agents. It's about having a structured record that you reviewed the materials that passed through your transaction.
The tool checks listing text against known fair housing risk patterns, preference language, neighborhood characterizations, and condo-specific disclosure requirements.
Direct or indirect language referencing race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status, or disability (federal protected classes), plus additional classes protected under Florida law.
Phrases that may imply a preference for or against specific groups, even when not explicitly discriminatory. Examples: "ideal for empty nesters," "no children," "exclusive community."
For condo listings: absence of special assessment disclosure, milestone inspection status, rental restrictions, association approval requirements, and monthly maintenance amounts.
Language that directly references or strongly implies preference based on a protected class. Almost always worth changing.
Language that may be perceived as non-neutral or exclusionary depending on context. Requires your professional judgment.
Suggestions for improved neutrality or missing disclosures. Not necessarily a violation, but worth reviewing as part of best practices.
Plain text — pasted directly. MLS descriptions, marketing flyers (text content only), social media post copy, broker remarks, email marketing text.
The tool flags it with a "Moderate Risk" indicator and explains both possible interpretations. Example: "Active lifestyle community" — may be neutral or may imply age preference depending on context.
The tool labels it "Not Disclosed in Listing" — not "Missing." The information may be disclosed elsewhere (e.g., in MLS data fields). The tool only sees what you paste.
The tool flags the phrase and notes: "This phrase may be perceived as non-neutral by some readers. Consider whether a neutral alternative is appropriate."
The tool notes that limited content may not provide sufficient context for a thorough review and recommends reviewing additional marketing materials if available.
A structured compliance scan based on a realistic South Florida condo listing.
Listing text reviewed: 247 words
Category: Familial status — preference language
Concern: This phrase may be interpreted as expressing a preference against families with children, which is a protected class under the Fair Housing Act.
Suggested Alternative: "Well-suited for a variety of lifestyles" or simply remove.
Category: Age/familial status — potentially exclusionary characterization
Concern: "Mature community" may be perceived as implying a preference for older residents or discouraging families with children. If the community does not qualify as 55+ housing under HOPA, this characterization carries risk.
Suggested Alternative: "Well-maintained community" or "Established community."
Category: Religion — neighborhood characterization
Concern: Referencing proximity to a specific religious institution may be perceived as steering toward or characterizing the neighborhood by religion.
Suggested Alternative: Reference proximity to general amenities. Example: "Convenient location near shops, restaurants, and community amenities."
Note: The listing does not reference whether any special assessments are active, pending, or recently completed. If applicable, consider whether disclosure in listing materials is appropriate.
Status: Present in listing text.
Note: Rental restriction details (minimum ownership period, lease approval requirements) are not mentioned. If the association imposes rental restrictions, consider whether disclosure is appropriate.
Note: No reference to milestone inspection (SB 4-D) status. For buildings within scope of the requirement, consider whether disclosure is appropriate.
Items with No Flags
— No disability-related language concerns identified.
— No race, color, or national origin language concerns identified.
— No sex or gender language concerns identified.
Get priority access to the Compliance Scanner and locked introductory pricing at launch. All three modules included at $49/month.
No spam. Launch updates only. Unsubscribe anytime.